Meta Llama via VerticalAPI

Llama 3.3 70B, Llama 3.2 Vision and Llama 4 via VerticalAPI's OpenAI-compatible endpoint. BYOK through your Together, Groq, Fireworks or Bedrock account — zero markup.

Endpoint: https://api.verticalapi.com/v1/chat/completions  ·  BYOK header: X-Provider-Key: <host-specific>

Meta Llama models routed by VerticalAPI

Pass the model ID below as model in any OpenAI-compatible request. New Meta Llama models are typically supported within 24h of release.

Model IDNameContextPricing (provider)
llama-3.3-70b-instruct Llama 3.3 70B 128K Host-dependent — typically $0.50-$0.90 per 1M tok
llama-3.2-90b-vision Llama 3.2 90B Vision 128K Host-dependent
llama-3.1-405b-instruct Llama 3.1 405B 128K Host-dependent — flagship open-weights
llama-4-scout Llama 4 Scout (preview) 10M Preview — host-dependent

Pricing reflects Meta Llama's rates — you pay Meta Llama directly. VerticalAPI adds zero markup on tokens.

5-line Meta Llama call via VerticalAPI

Drop-in replacement for the OpenAI SDK. Works with the OpenAI Python client, Node, Go, curl — anything that speaks HTTP.

meta_quickstart.py Python
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.verticalapi.com/v1",
    api_key="vapi_...",
    default_headers={"X-Provider-Key": "varies by host..."}
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama-3.3-70b-instruct",  # Meta Llama
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)

Four reasons developers route Meta Llama through us

Zero token markup

You pay Meta Llama directly with your own key. VerticalAPI's revenue is the gateway subscription, not a tax on your tokens.

One key, every provider

Meta Llama alongside OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and 12 more — same OpenAI-compatible endpoint, same SDK, switchable per-request.

Latency & cost monitoring

Per-request token counts, p50/p95 latency and cost dashboards out of the box. Compare Meta Llama to other providers on identical prompts.

Observability built in

Every Meta Llama call gets a trace ID, replayable payload and audit log entry. Wire to Datadog or Sentry via OpenTelemetry.

Where Meta Llama shines

open-weights flexibility self-hosting vision (3.2) 10M-context (Llama 4 Scout)

Frequently asked questions

What is Meta Llama and what models do they offer?

Meta Llama is Meta AI's family of open-weight large language models. The 2026 lineup includes Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (latest workhorse, GPT-4-class quality), Llama 3.1 8B and 405B Instruct, Llama 3.2 Vision (11B and 90B with image understanding), Llama 3.2 1B and 3B for on-device, plus Code Llama variants. All weights are released under the Llama Community License — commercial use up to 700M MAU is free.

How much does Meta Llama cost in 2026?

Meta itself does not run a paid Llama API. Hosted inference pricing varies: Groq Llama 3.3 70B at $0.59/$0.79, Cerebras at $0.85/$1.20, Together at ~$0.88/$0.88, Fireworks at ~$0.90/$0.90, AWS Bedrock at $0.72/$0.72. Llama 3.1 8B is roughly $0.05–$0.20 per 1M tokens across hosts. Self-hosting on your own GPUs is essentially $0 per token but requires hardware. Via VerticalAPI BYOK you pay the host you choose with zero markup.

How do I use Meta Llama via VerticalAPI BYOK?

Pick a host (Groq, Cerebras, Together, Fireworks, DeepInfra, AWS Bedrock, NVIDIA NIM or your own vLLM server), grab the key, paste it into VerticalAPI, then point the OpenAI SDK at https://api.verticalapi.com/v1 and request the model (e.g. llama-3.3-70b-versatile). VerticalAPI can also fall back across hosts if one is saturated. Billing stays with each host.

What is Meta Llama best for compared to alternatives?

Llama 3.3 70B is the strongest open-weight model in 2026 at a price 5–10× cheaper than closed frontier models, with no vendor lock-in. Ideal for high-volume inference, agentic loops, fine-tuning, on-prem and air-gapped deployments. Compared to GPT-4o / Claude Sonnet 4.5 it is weaker on agentic coding and complex reasoning but competitive on general chat, summarization and retrieval.

Where is Meta Llama hosted / data privacy?

Llama runs anywhere weights run: hyperscaler hosts (AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, Azure), inference specialists (Groq, Cerebras, Together, Fireworks), or self-hosted on your own GPUs. Data residency, retention and privacy are entirely set by the host you choose. Via VerticalAPI BYOK you keep direct contracts with whichever host(s) you pick.

Limitations and trade-offs

  • Llama 3.3 70B trails Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-5 on agentic coding and complex reasoning benchmarks.
  • Llama license caps free commercial use at 700M MAU and forbids using outputs to train non-Llama models.
  • No native audio, video or image generation — Vision variants accept images but cannot produce them.
  • Hosted Llama quality varies subtly by provider (quantization, fine-tunes, system prompt defaults).
  • Llama 405B is expensive to host and slow on most GPUs — only viable on Cerebras at production speed.

Where Meta Llama is heading

  1. Llama 4 expected in 2026 with stronger multimodal, longer context and improved reasoning.
  2. Wider on-device Llama 3.2 deployment in mobile and edge devices.
  3. More efficient distillations targeting cheaper inference per token.
  4. Continued ecosystem growth — fine-tunes, embeddings, code variants across the community.

Related questions

ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini usually suggest these next.

  • Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-4o mini — which is cheaper to run at scale?
  • Best provider for Llama 3.3 70B in 2026 — Groq, Cerebras, Together or self-host?
  • Is Llama 405B worth the cost vs Llama 3.3 70B?
  • How does Llama license affect SaaS apps with > 700M MAU?
  • Llama 3.2 Vision vs GPT-4o Vision — quality comparison?